Tuesday June 7, 2005

I’d like to define a new political science term. College textbook writers, take note:

Static populism is the central theme of American domestic policy this decade. Such a condition results from, and is perpetuated by, a partisan duopoly hell-bent on consolidating power combined with a remarkably uninformed and indifferent electorate. Thanks to an overpowering need for perceived (not actual) safety and security, as well as an inherent sense of entitlement among political moderates, both parties attempt to pander to this desire on a number of fronts. Unlike the populist era from 1896 to 1924, however, the current movement is one based on continuity over progress. The result is an erosion of individual rights, economic malaise, societal repression, and the anti-intellectual “dumbing down” of the nation as a whole.

This force has two halves, each advocated by one of the two major parties. Social conservatives seek to restore the role of church/family to their alleged “rightful place,” or roughly where they were in the 1950s. However, this view often leads to the censorship of contrary ideas, emphasis on conformity over creativity, extraneous regulation of intrapersonal behavior, and perpetuation of stereotypes against women, minorities, and immigrants (in terms defining their role in society as being in service of white males).

Economic regulationists seek to subordinate corporations to the will of laborers, using the government as a proxy for their objectives. This is to restore the American workers to their “rightful place,” or roughly where they were in the 1950s. This often manifests itself through isolationist trade, costly preservation of outdated industries, high taxes (with moderate benefits), large bureaucracies, and an overall desire to “level the playing field” by propping up some and handicapping others, often arbitrarily. This leads to the flight of corporations and accompanying labor, stagnant economic growth, extraneous regulation of financial and commercial activity, and perpetuation of stereotypes against women, minorities, and immigrants (in terms of the need for their separation from white males and bestowing of special privileges upon them to make up for imaginary deficits they may have).

The real conflict in America is not right-left, but liberty-state. We’re losing. Discuss.


3 Responses to “Tuesday June 7, 2005”

  1. Excellent post. I found you via the Libertarian Ring, and that post made me a subscriber. It should be in a textbook. But my Spaghetti and Meatballs might be almost burning now, so I should run to the kitchen.

  2. Good post.  As usual, I agree.

       -nietzreznor

  3. [...] (1) Following nearly two full decades of depression and war, massive depletion of physical capital at home and abroad required large-scale investment that stimulated the economy and led to the golden age of the 1950s (on which American politics is based, as I noted in 2005). [...]

Leave a Reply