Archive for October, 2006

Tuesday October 24, 2006

Posted in News on 24 October 2006 by Johnny

A post from Reason Hit & Run points me to a disturbing press release from Rep. Jim Leach (R-IA). Meanwhile, I’ve made a few strategic edits that reveal the truth:

“In its last act before adjourning, Congress enacted Bill Frist blackmailed his fellow legislators into passing the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. (Hey, at least they admit the bill was unlawful. Wait … you say that’s not what they meant? — ed.) Passage of the measure, which is designed to stem the growth of gambling on the Internet, caps a multi-year effort by Congressman Jim Leach to protect American families from themselves, the idiots that we think they are.

While Internet gambling has been illegal since its inception, the government has had no way to enforce applicable state and federal law. (And that’s stopped you before? — ed.) The Leach bill makes it illegal for financial institutions and credit card companies to process payments for settling Internet gambling wagers and creates new criminal penalties for Internet gambling businesses. Companion legislation was offered in the Senate by Jon Kyl of Arizona.

“It is extraordinary how many American families have been touched by large losses from Internet gambling,” Leach said. “As a professor of business at the University of Illinois has noted, the Internet is ‘crack cocaine’ for gamblers, in that you snort your losses through the Internet’s series of tubes. ‘There are no needle marks,’ he says. ‘There is no alcohol on the breath. You just click the mouse and lose your house.’” (I mean, man, I know what he’s talking about, all those people who put money in NCAA tournament pools staggering around, shivering, asking if anyone’s got a quarter … or a line on the Jets game this weekend. — ed.)

Researchers have called gambling online addictive. Players attest to becoming obsessed with it. According to a study by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, nearly 10 percent of college students gambled online last year. (Only ten? — ed.) The number of college males who reported gambling online once a week quadrupled in the last year alone. At that rate, over 300% of fraternity members will be gambling online by 2009.

“Internet gambling’s characteristics are unique. Never has it been so easy to lose so much money so quickly at such a young age. The casino is in effect brought to the home, office and college dorm. Children may play without verification (not true — ed.), and betting with a credit card can undercut a player’s perception of the value of cash, which too easily leads to bankruptcy and crime. Unlike buying lottery tickets, which are completely consequence free. By the way, the Powerball jackpot is up to $63 million. Play the Iowa Lottery — you too could win!

“In my old hometown of Davenport this past summer, two young men from middle-class families who attended college in Iowa got so far behind in their Internet gambling losses that they decided to rob a series of homes. From one they took cigars and golf clubs but were thoughtful enough not to pinch the Heisman trophy in the bookcase. They were caught when they advertised Johnny Lujack’s golf clubs online. Now these young men face the prospect of prison rather than graduation. And naturally, one example always exemplifies a trend. ALWAYS.

“The reason the NCAA, NFL, NBA, MBA (the what? — ed.) and NHL support this legislation is that they are concerned with the integrity of the games and public relations. The reason the religious community – from Baptists and Methodists to Muslims – has rallied to this cause is because it is concerned for the unity of the American family. Internet gambling is not a subject touched upon in the Old or New Testament or the Koran. (Are you sure? I guess my Gospel of Luke is different from yours: “Yea, and the Lord said, thou shalt not use thine mouse to take the points.” — ed.) But the pastoral function is one of dealing with families in difficulty and religious leaders of all denominations and faiths are seeing gambling problems erode family values.

“What’s more, Internet gambling is a national security concern because it can be used to launder money, evade taxes and finance criminal and terrorist activities. Banning Internet gambling to push it underground is obviously better than regulating it and keeping track of the money ourselves. It’s science.

“If Congress had not acted, gamblers would soon be able to place bets not just from home computers, but from their cell phones while they drive home from work or their Blackberries as they wait in line at the movies, as opposed to calling their bookies using … their cell phones. Damn, now we’ve got to ban cell phones!

“Unlike brick-and-mortar casinos in the United States, where legal protections for bettors exist and where there are some compensatory social benefit in jobs and tax revenues and where executives have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to our campaigns, Internet gambling sites principally yield only liabilities to America and to Americans.

“Some have suggested that there is no call (Who made that call? Was it in response to a raise? We’ve got to start an investigation! — ed.) to rein in the activities of individual choice. But misjudgments affect society as a whole. There is nothing in Internet gambling that adds to the GDP or makes America more competitive in the world. (That’s the standard for what we’re allowed to do now?! — ed.) Indeed, if an individual cannot repay his or her credit card debts, neighbors will be subject to higher interest rates. Everyone loses if this industry continues its remarkable growth trends. Y’know, except for that guy who would have hit a straight flush on the river, that smug bastard.

The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve Board will jointly develop implementing rules for the Act with Bill Frist and myself pointing a gun to their heads, and financial institutions have nine months to adapt to the sophisticated new obligations.”

Idiots. You’re all idiots.

Monday October 23, 2006

Posted in Sports on 23 October 2006 by Johnny

Sign up to coach my alma mater’s football team! Odds are you can’t do much worse than the outgoing coach, who has an overall record of 25-42 and just lost to mediocre Virginia 23-0 on ESPN. UNC has only one win this year. Over I-AA Furman. By three points. Underwhelming.

Personally, I knew Coach Bunting needed to be fired when Willie Parker became a star for Pittsburgh, notably running for the longest touchdown in Super Bowl history last February. Parker went to North Carolina where, naturally, he was the backup. Great eye for talent, John.

Unfortunately, Bunting will be allowed to play out the string and lose five more games. In all honesty, though, he would have been gone long ago if North Carolina wasn’t a basketball school, and a baseball school, and a soccer school … and, well, an everything-except-football school.

Monday October 23, 2006

Posted in Thought on 23 October 2006 by Johnny

Odds are you won’t hear about this anywhere else, so I’ll mention it here. Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Hungarian Revolution. A student protest on this date in 1956 quickly evolved into a wholesale overthrow of the Communist government, with hopes of establishing a multi-party democracy outside the purview of the Warsaw Pact. After two weeks of freedom, however, the full brunt of the Soviet army slashed through the country, slaughtering 2,500 Hungarian militiamen and untold thousands of innocent civilians. Those responsible for the uprising were sent to their deaths while thousands more were incarcerated as political prisoners. 200,000 refugees fled to Austria for refuge from the brutality of the Soviet crackdown. Imre Nagy, a former Communist premier who had been restored to that position after the revolution, was executed in Moscow in 1958, convicted of treason.

We don’t do enough in this country to commemorate those who fought against the horrible oppression that hundreds of millions of people suffered under at the hands of the Soviet Union, and all others who sought nothing more than self-determination for their people, so here’s a small tribute for the sacrifices of those who fought to live in a free society. We’re going to need some people of that mind soon enough.

Read more about the 1956 Revolution here and here.

UPDATE (7pm): Agitated student-types, marking the anniversary earlier today, apparently held demonstrators that got a bit out of control, culminating in the protesters swiping a Soviet-era tank. (No, it isn’t clear how that happened.) The protests likely stem from an off-the-cuff remark by the nation’s premier that he had lied his way to an election day victory, launching the nation into political turmoil. (As Jon Stewart said on the subject, “In America, we call that Tuesday.”)

Sunday October 22, 2006

Posted in Other on 22 October 2006 by Johnny

American Pie — quite possibly the best song of the pop era (1955-present) — has finally been featured in, of course, a Chevrolet commercial. This is the sort of thing you knew was inevitable, but desperately hoped would never happen, as it would be so thoroughly wrong. Then again, once you’ve used Money by Pink Floyd in an ad for a stock brokerage and Mercedes Benz by Janis Joplin to sell the titular car, we’ve all sold our souls, right?

Sunday October 22, 2006

Posted in News on 22 October 2006 by Johnny

I’m surprised this sort of thing hasn’t happened before, given the poor quality of elevators in old tower dormitories …

COLUMBUS, Ohio – An Ohio State University student was killed after he was pinned by an elevator, authorities said.

Andrew Polakowski, 18, of Erie, Pa., was the last person in a group of students to enter the elevator on the third floor about 11:30 p.m. Friday when it unexpectedly began to descend with the doors open, said Rick Amweg, assistant chief of the campus police.

Polakowski, a freshman pre-business major, was pinned when he tried to escape through a gap between the top of the elevator and the third floor, police said.

It was unclear if he jumped or tried to climb out, Amweg said. It also wasn’t clear why the elevator descended with the doors open. Students gave differing accounts of how many people were inside.

Polakowski had chest and abdominal injuries, and he died of mechanical asphyxia, said Franklin County Coroner Bradley Lewis. The student was dead at the scene, Lewis said.

The dormitory, Stradley Hall, has 11 floors and about 400 residents, Amweg said.

Saturday October 21, 2006

Posted in Sports on 21 October 2006 by Johnny

Oct. 14: #24 Rutgers (5-0) travels on the road to face one-loss Navy as a 1 1/2 point underdog. Defense destroys Navy’s top-ranked rushing offense and Mike Teel throws for 215 yards and three touchdowns. Rutgers 34, Navy 0.

Oct. 21: #19 Rutgers (6-0) travels on the road to face one-loss Pittsburgh as a 6 1/2 point underdog. Defense destroys the top-rated quarterback in the nation, Tyler Palko, and Ray Rice runs for 226 yards. Rutgers 20, Pitt 10.

If Vegas rates us as anything less than two-touchdown favorites at home against Connecticut, we’re gonna smash some skulls. While we’re at it, could the pollsters rate us above at least one other unbeaten? (C’mon, Boise State?)

From the department of things I was quite certain I’d never say: The Scarlet Knights are national title contenders. On top of that, Ray Rice has a good shot at a Heisman in the next three years before he starts playing on Sundays.

No, seriously, stop laughing. West Virginia and Louisville are overrated …

Friday October 20, 2006

Posted in News on 20 October 2006 by Johnny

Thursday October 19, 2006

Posted in Sports on 19 October 2006 by Johnny

Endy Chavez: Catch of the century.

We’ll see how this one turns out …

If the Mets win, this clip is immortal.

UPDATE (11:45 pm): But they didn’t.

Thursday October 19, 2006

Posted in News on 19 October 2006 by Johnny

Thursday October 19, 2006

Posted in News on 19 October 2006 by Johnny

Your president signs a bill passed by Congress that allows him to arbitrarily lock up whomever he wants.

KEITH OLBERMANN, “COUNTDOWN” ANCHOR: I want to start by asking you about a specific part of this act that lists one of the definitions of an unlawful enemy combatant as, quote, “a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a combatant status review tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the president or the secretary of defense.”

Does that not basically mean that if Mr. Bush or Mr. Rumsfeld say so, anybody in this country, citizen or not, innocent or not, can end up being an unlawful enemy combatant?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR:  It certainly does.  In fact, later on, it says that if you even give material support to an organization that the president deems connected to one of these groups, you too can be an enemy combatant.

And the fact that he appoints this tribunal is meaningless.  You know, standing behind him at the signing ceremony was his attorney general, who signed a memo that said that you could torture people, that you could do harm to them to the point of organ failure or death.

So if he appoints someone like that to be attorney general, you can imagine who he’s going be putting on this board.

OLBERMANN:  Does this mean that under this law, ultimately the only thing keeping you, I, or the viewer out of Gitmo is the sanity and honesty of the president of the United States?

TURLEY:  It does.  And it’s a huge sea change for our democracy.  The framers created a system where we did not have to rely on the good graces or good mood of the president.  In fact, Madison said that he created a system essentially to be run by devils, where they could not do harm, because we didn’t rely on their good motivations.

Now we must.  And people have no idea how significant this is.  What, really, a time of shame this is for the American system.  What the Congress did and what the president signed today essentially revokes over 200 years of American principles and values.

It couldn’t be more significant.  And the strange thing is, we’ve become sort of constitutional couch potatoes.  I mean, the Congress just gave the president despotic powers, and you could hear the yawn across the country as people turned to, you know, “Dancing with the Stars.”  I mean, it’s otherworldly.

OLBERMANN:  Is there one defense against this, the legal challenges against particularly the suspension or elimination of habeas corpus from the equation?  And where do they stand, and how likely are they to overturn this action today?

TURLEY:  Well, you know what?  I think people are fooling themselves if they believe that the courts will once again stop this president from taking over—taking almost absolute power.  It basically comes down to a single vote on the Supreme Court, Justice Kennedy.  And he indicated that if Congress gave the president these types of powers, that he might go along.

And so we may have, in this country, some type of uber-president, some absolute ruler, and it’ll be up to him who gets put away as an enemy combatant, held without trial.

It’s something that no one thought—certainly I didn’t think—was possible in the United States.  And I am not too sure how we got to this point.  But people clearly don’t realize what a fundamental change it is about who we are as a country.  What happened today changed us.  And I’m not too sure we’re going to change back anytime soon.

OLBERMANN:  And if Justice Kennedy tries to change us back, we can always call him an enemy combatant.

The president reiterated today the United States does not torture.  Does this law actually guarantee anything like that?

TURLEY:  That’s actually when I turned off my TV set, because I couldn’t believe it.  You know, the United States has engaged in torture.  And the whole world community has denounced the views of this administration, its early views that the president could order torture, could cause injury up to organ failure or death.

The administration has already established that it has engaged in things like waterboarding, which is not just torture.  We prosecuted people after World War II for waterboarding prisoners.  We treated it as a war crime.  And my God, what a change of fate, where we are now embracing the very thing that we once prosecuted people for.

Who are we now?  I know who we were then.  But when the president said that we don’t torture, that was, frankly, when I had to turn off my TV set.

OLBERMANN:  That same individual fell back on the same argument that he’d used about the war in Iraq to sanction this law.  Let me play what he said and then ask you a question about it.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PRESIDENT BUSH:  Yet with the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few.  Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously?  And did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

OLBERMANN:  Does he understand the irony of those words when taken out of the context of this particular passage or of what he perceives as the war against terror, and that, in fact, the threat we may be facing is the threat of President George W. Bush?

TURLEY:  Well, this is going to go down in history as one of our greatest self-inflicted wounds.  And I think you can feel the judgment of history.  It won’t be kind to President Bush.

But frankly, I don’t think that it will be kind to the rest of us.  I think that history will ask, Where were you?  What did you do when this thing was signed into law?  There were people that protested the Japanese concentration camps, there were people that protested these other acts.  But we are strangely silent in this national yawn as our rights evaporate.

OLBERMANN:  Well, not to pat ourselves on the back too much, but I think we’ve done a little bit of what we could have done. I’ll see you at Gitmo. As always, greatest thanks for your time, Jon.

TURLEY:  Thanks, Keith.

Mr. Olbermann seems more and more like a prophet by the day. I’ll post the so-called “special comment” that he presented this evening at my first opportunity.

Enjoy the dictatorship, ladies and gentlemen.